Page 2 of 3

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: November 29th, 2009, 3:41 pm
by Prongs
Garchomp is fine but a pseudo legendary should have a cool base form too.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: November 29th, 2009, 5:19 pm
by taninamdar
Garchomp is lot better than salamance and taryanitar.
I like it.

I like also gen 4 pokemons.
But I agree that views may differ from person to person.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 1st, 2009, 12:12 pm
by Maxedge
me like dragonair and suicune!!
Don't ask why but they are from Gen 1-2 I guess

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2009, 1:09 pm
by Garreth
taninamdar wrote:Garchomp is lot better than salamance and taryanitar.

I call bs. >:[


adyniz wrote:These all pokes are generation 4 pokemon not 5.


Garreth wrote:Generation 4 was the worst generation of pokemon ever made and the creators should be ashamed of themselves for creating it! They ruined a lot of my old school favorites as well as creating a lot of lame/weird designs for these new pokemon


Read closer.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 2nd, 2009, 11:45 pm
by adyniz
Garreth wrote:
taninamdar wrote:Garchomp is lot better than salamance and taryanitar.

I call bs. >:[


adyniz wrote:These all pokes are generation 4 pokemon not 5.


Garreth wrote:Generation 4 was the worst generation of pokemon ever made and the creators should be ashamed of themselves for creating it! They ruined a lot of my old school favorites as well as creating a lot of lame/weird designs for these new pokemon


Read closer.

Oh, my mistake.
Sorry :)

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 3rd, 2009, 10:08 am
by taninamdar
But they are awesome.
Still, views may differ.

btw have you introduced urself in introduction, Garreth?

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 3rd, 2009, 12:03 pm
by adyniz
I think yes.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 3rd, 2009, 12:28 pm
by Garreth
Generation 4 pokemon destroyed my childhood of pokemon, you have to be an old fart like me to understand that.

Oh and yah, I introduced myself a while ago. I'm the new guy.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 3rd, 2009, 12:55 pm
by adyniz
You are from california?

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 4th, 2009, 1:53 pm
by taninamdar
I think gen3 was worst.
Gen 4 is good.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 4th, 2009, 6:20 pm
by adyniz
Generation 3 was a little crapish.
Generation 4 is fantastic because it introduced the evolutions of some previous generation pokemon.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 4th, 2009, 8:27 pm
by taninamdar
Yes and has best moves too.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 4th, 2009, 8:53 pm
by adyniz
Yup, but i like those evolutions.
Specially Empoleon.

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 13th, 2009, 12:57 pm
by Kawaii-Abhi
I think gen 3 remade the entire pokemon ecosystem, they fitted the new pokemon into the original ecological nichés .
Gen 4 felt more like a follow-up and attempting to add more balance and colour to the biosphere, much like gen 2 (the original nichés were completely undisturbed,while adding more, like pidgey was kept as the common bird while the hoothoot line was simply a nighttime bird line, of course this could be because of the geographical closeness of Kanto and Johto)
Gen 3, as I said replaces stuff like Clamperl instead of shellder
Gen 4 gives us additional niches like draconian land sharks that live in caves that need Flash!
I have no objections to the designs, all of them, maybe not probopass, are okay for me. ( i think nosepass's hideous too btw)

Re: Gen 4 + 5 >:[

PostPosted: December 13th, 2009, 3:58 pm
by Prongs
Maxedge wrote:me like dragonair and suicune!!
Don't ask why but they are from Gen 1-2 I guess

SO THAT IS WHY I HAD TO BEAT A SUICUNE IN AN ASDB BATTLE THAT BANNED LEGENDARIES!
I had to change a few rules in the end.